7 articles
The Department of Justice is seeking to overturn seditious conspiracy convictions related to the January 6th Capitol attack, a move legal experts find extraordinary. Concerns are also rising over comments suggesting a president has the right to direct DOJ investigations into individuals, challenging post-Watergate norms.
A death penalty case in Utah faces key legal battles over potential prosecutorial conflicts of interest and the public's right to see graphic evidence. The judge is carefully considering whether to allow cameras in the courtroom, balancing fair trial rights with transparency.
A federal judge has revealed that the prosecution admitted having zero evidence against Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell. The investigation, now deemed to be in "bad faith," was reportedly aimed at harassing Powell and influencing interest rates. This lack of evidence has led to the quashing of subpoenas and raises serious questions about the motives behind the probe.
Hillary Clinton's deposition in the Jeffrey Epstein case was halted after her legal team discovered photos of her testifying were taken and leaked. Attorney David Kendall threatened to end the proceedings, calling the actions 'typical behavior' and demanding accountability.
Judge Aileen Cannon has ordered that former Special Counsel Jack Smith's report on Donald Trump's classified documents case remain sealed, drawing criticism. The decision prevents public access to potentially damaging details, while a separate lawsuit seeking disclosure is pending appeal.
A Myrtle Beach woman and a deputy coroner were convicted in the brutal murder of her ex-partner, Gregory Rice. The investigation uncovered a web of deceit, including a love triangle and disturbing child abuse.
Prince Andrew has been released under investigation following his arrest, with legal experts highlighting the complex challenges of proving misconduct in public office. The notoriously difficult-to-define offense requires establishing that his trade envoy role constituted public office and that any misconduct was deliberate and serious enough to undermine public trust.
