31 articles
A federal judge is hearing arguments in a dispute between the Pentagon and the New York Times over journalist access. The case centers on whether the Pentagon is complying with a court order to restore press credentials and access after a policy restricted reporters seeking classified information.
The Pentagon is blocking reporters from their usual workspace, moving them to an annex and requiring escorts. This follows a legal battle with the New York Times over new reporting restrictions. The move raises serious concerns about government transparency and the freedom of the press.
The Pentagon has issued new rules restricting press access, potentially defying a federal judge's order and facing contempt charges. These rules redefine press freedom as a privilege, not a right, and limit journalists' ability to gather information. The situation is a critical test for First Amendment protections.
A federal judge ruled that the Pentagon's policy restricting press credentials based on potential "security risks" violates the First Amendment. The decision came after a lawsuit by The New York Times and other media outlets, who argued the policy amounted to viewpoint discrimination and a gag order. The discussion also honored Robert Mueller's legacy of public service and touched on the Supreme Court's review of mail-in voting laws.
A federal judge has voided a new Pentagon press policy, ruling it violates the First Amendment. The policy required journalists to agree to Pentagon review of their work, a condition most news outlets refused. The decision protects the press's ability to report freely on critical issues like war.
A recent court ruling has ordered the reinstatement of Voice of America (VOA), a global news network shut down under the Trump administration. The decision aims to restore VOA's operations, which were disrupted, leaving millions without a key source of independent news. However, questions remain about VOA's future editorial independence and ability to regain audience trust.
A federal judge has ruled against the Pentagon's controversial media restrictions, calling them unconstitutional in a win for press freedom. Meanwhile, President Trump's administration faces growing concerns over the impact of the Strait of Hormuz closure on global energy markets.
A federal judge has ruled against Pentagon officials who attempted to ban news organizations from briefings, upholding the First Amendment. The decision prevents government officials from controlling media access and reinforces the press's role in informing the public, especially during times of war. This ruling is seen as a significant victory for press freedom and a check against potential government censorship.
The Trump administration is escalating its public criticism of US media outlets covering the Iran war, accusing them of bias and spreading "fake news." Veteran journalist Frank Sesno describes the approach as unprecedented and disturbing, arguing that it undermines public trust and distracts from critical real-world issues.
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has threatened broadcast licenses for media outlets not serving the "public interest," following President Trump's criticism of war coverage. Experts warn this move could stifle press freedom during wartime and influence reporting narratives.
