24 articles
Intelligence expert Denver Riggleman has strongly refuted former President Donald Trump's claim that Iran was responsible for a deadly school bombing in Iran, stating that U.S. intelligence would have easily determined the true perpetrators. Riggleman, a former Air Force intelligence officer, called Trump's accusation "ludicrous" and highlighted a pattern of disinformation.
Senator Marco Rubio's recent justifications for military action in the Middle East have been widely criticized as illogical, forcing the administration into damage control. His remarks, and President Trump's subsequent admission of acting on a "hunch," raise serious questions about the basis of U.S. foreign policy decisions.
Senator Angus King is questioning the intelligence justifying recent U.S. strikes in Iran, stating there was no evidence of an imminent Iranian threat. He emphasizes the need for congressional approval for war and expresses doubt about achieving regime change through airstrikes alone.
The U.S. is reportedly considering significant military strikes against Iran, targeting missile facilities and potentially leadership. While Iran's regime faces internal weaknesses and diminished proxy capabilities, the threat from short-range missiles remains a concern. The decision-making process involves detailed intelligence analysis within the White House Situation Room.
