36 articles
A federal judge ruled that the Pentagon's policy restricting press credentials based on potential "security risks" violates the First Amendment. The decision came after a lawsuit by The New York Times and other media outlets, who argued the policy amounted to viewpoint discrimination and a gag order. The discussion also honored Robert Mueller's legacy of public service and touched on the Supreme Court's review of mail-in voting laws.
The Pentagon is moving its press offices to a new annex after a federal judge ruled against new restrictions on journalists. The New York Times is taking the administration back to court, calling the move an unconstitutional restriction on reporters covering the U.S. military. Experts see this as a "battle of attrition" to transform media access and challenge First Amendment rights.
The Pentagon has implemented new, more restrictive media policies after a judge ruled previous ones violated the First Amendment. Veteran correspondent Barbra Starr questions Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth's motives and calls for broader access for all journalists.
The Supreme Court declined to hear an independent journalist's appeal after she was arrested for publishing victim identities obtained from a police officer. The court's decision upholds legal immunity for officials, raising concerns for journalistic freedom. Separately, an appeal from death row inmate Rodney Reed was also rejected.
A federal judge has voided a new Pentagon press policy, ruling it violates the First Amendment. The policy required journalists to agree to Pentagon review of their work, a condition most news outlets refused. The decision protects the press's ability to report freely on critical issues like war.
A federal judge has ruled against Pentagon officials who attempted to ban news organizations from briefings, upholding the First Amendment. The decision prevents government officials from controlling media access and reinforces the press's role in informing the public, especially during times of war. This ruling is seen as a significant victory for press freedom and a check against potential government censorship.
The Trump administration faces serious allegations of attempting to illegally censor war coverage and retaliate against independent media. Legal experts and lawmakers are raising alarms about potential First Amendment violations and the abuse of government power. The administration's actions have drawn bipartisan criticism and have been met with significant pushback from the judiciary.
FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez asserts that Chairman Brendan Carr's threats against broadcasters lack constitutional authority, calling them an attempt to intimidate the press. Gomez warns that such actions, including leveraging merger approvals, aim to silence critical reporting and erode First Amendment protections.
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has threatened to revoke broadcaster licenses over their coverage of the Trump administration's Iran policy, a move President Trump has endorsed. Critics, including Senator Ron Johnson, decry the actions as a violation of the First Amendment and an overreach of government power.
Viral deposition videos from former employees of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are drawing scrutiny in a civil lawsuit. The suit alleges DOGE violated the First Amendment by canceling over 1,400 arts, history, and education grants. A former staffer admitted the agency failed to reduce the federal deficit as claimed.
