13 articles
A forensic expert analyzes the murder charges against a stepbrother in the disturbing case of Anna Kepner. Evidence of assault and a body hidden suggest a brutal crime and a desperate cover-up.
New body camera footage from Tiger Woods' DUI arrest offers a different perspective on his condition. Defense attorney Mark Geragos argues the video challenges initial impairment assessments. The case now hinges on interpreting sobriety tests, medication, and refusal of a urine test.
Defense lawyers for Tyler Robinson, accused in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, are seeking a delay, arguing ballistics evidence could prove his innocence. An ATF report stated a bullet recovered could not be linked to Robinson's alleged rifle, a claim the prosecution argues is not definitive. Legal experts weigh in on the technical and legal implications.
Tiger Woods has announced he is stepping away for treatment following his recent DUI arrest. His attorney suggests prescription drug use may be a factor, similar to his 2017 DUI case. Woods faces charges including refusing a urine test, with legal experts analyzing his defense strategy.
Tiger Woods faces a difficult DUI case after his recent arrest where he refused a urine test. His legal history, including a 2017 DUI and a history of surgeries and prescription pain medication, adds complexity. Prosecutors face challenges proving impairment without toxicology results, while the defense may point to his injuries.
MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas provided live commentary on breaking news on March 24, 2026. His analysis focused on legal and political developments, aiming to offer immediate context and interpretation for a rapidly evolving news cycle.
A recent civil verdict against Bill Cosby highlights how cultural shifts like #MeToo can influence legal outcomes, even with old allegations and limited evidence. The decision raises questions about public opinion's role in justice and the financial future of the entertainer.
Legal analysts are questioning the validity of investigations into Donald Trump, citing jurisdictional issues and statutes of limitations. The argument is made that political motivations, rather than the law, may be driving these cases, with some accusing the current administration of aiding Trump's "revenge tour."
An analysis explores potential legal avenues to hold Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi accountable for alleged false testimony regarding the Jeffrey Epstein files. The discussion centers on navigating conflicts of interest within the Department of Justice and the possibility of court-appointed special prosecutors.
New revelations in the Epstein scandal, Pam Bondi's potential legal jeopardy, and significant court losses for the DOJ signal a period of intense scrutiny and accountability. These interconnected events highlight systemic issues in governance and justice.
