75 articles
Iran's threats to control the Strait of Hormuz pose a significant risk to global trade and regional stability. Analyst Gerard Felitti discusses the geographical advantages Iran holds and outlines potential military and diplomatic responses. Achieving lasting peace may require a fundamental shift in Iran's ideology and government.
A new Israeli law allowing the death penalty for Palestinians has ignited global outrage, fueling accusations of discrimination and apartheid. Reports of widespread abuse in Israeli prisons and settler violence further intensify international concern. This growing criticism signals a potential shift in global alliances and domestic political debates.
President Donald Trump's shifting deadlines and aggressive rhetoric regarding Iran have drawn sharp criticism and renewed calls for impeachment. Analysts point to the unpredictability as a sign of weakness, while concerns mount over potential targeting of civilian infrastructure.
President Trump announced the rescue of a missing U.S. airman from Iran, but simultaneously escalated his aggressive rhetoric towards Tehran. He warned of "power plant day and bridge day" and threatened Iranians would "be living in hell" if they don't comply with U.S. demands.
International law experts are raising alarms over U.S. and Israeli actions in Iran, accusing them of violating international law and potentially committing war crimes. The conflict has seen strikes on civilian infrastructure, drawing condemnation and warnings of wider regional war.
The U.S. destroyed a major bridge near Tehran, prompting accusations of war crimes. President Trump celebrated the strike online. Experts question the legality and strategic value of targeting civilian infrastructure, warning of a dangerous escalation.
Middle East analyst Gerard Filitti explains that Iran's dangerous ideology remains unchanged despite leadership shifts. He argues that true change must come from the Iranian people reclaiming their nation, while the U.S. focuses on strategic military action and preventing nuclear proliferation.
Donald Trump has threatened to commit war crimes in Iran by destroying essential infrastructure if his demands regarding oil exports are not met. This statement, made despite claims of prior military success, raises serious legal and ethical concerns and highlights the complex interplay of oil, politics, and international law.
Wall Street rallied on hopes for an end to the Iran conflict, but rising oil prices and disrupted shipping in the Strait of Hormuz persist. A retired four-star general warned that striking Iran's desalination plants would be a grave mistake, potentially violating international law and causing widespread damage.
Former President Donald Trump's threats to target Iran's water desalination plants are drawing sharp criticism from legal and military experts, who warn of potential war crimes. While U.S. forces have degraded Iran's military, a clear path to victory remains uncertain, highlighting the need for diplomacy alongside continued military pressure.
