26 articles
A federal judge's warning could jeopardize thousands of Justice Department cases by challenging the legitimacy of Trump-appointed special attorneys. This ruling underscores a constitutional clash over executive power and prosecutorial integrity.
The Senate's recent vote against a War Powers Resolution to block military action against Iran has reignited debate over Congress's constitutional authority. While some defend the executive's actions, critics argue it undermines democratic oversight and risks prolonged, undeclared wars.
Calls for President Trump's impeachment have surged following recent military actions against Iran, which the administration itself termed "war." Critics point to the Constitution's Article 1, Section 8, which grants Congress the sole power to declare war, raising questions about executive overreach and accountability.
Recent military actions in Iran, explicitly called a "war" by the Trump administration, have reignited calls for impeachment. The debate centers on the constitutional authority to declare war, traditionally vested in Congress, and the implications of the AUMF.
Congress is challenging President Trump's military actions in Iran with a bipartisan War Powers Resolution, aiming to reclaim its constitutional authority. The administration's use of 'special military operation' rhetoric and shifting justifications have intensified the debate over war powers and accountability.
The US strike on Iran in February 2026 bypassed Congress, leaving the public without clear answers. This analysis delves into the shifting justifications, the constitutional crisis, and the implications for democratic norms and regional stability.
MAGA Republicans face mounting criticism for their justifications of potential military action against Iran, revealing a perceived conflict between "America First" rhetoric and a foreign policy driven by allied interests. The debate highlights constitutional questions and the historical echoes of past interventions.
A former ICE attorney has resigned, alleging a scheme to dismantle vital training programs and teach cadets to violate the Constitution. The whistleblower's testimony, shared in a 'shadow hearing,' has sparked calls for greater accountability and has been described as "devastating" by experts. The situation raises serious questions about the integrity of immigration enforcement and the adherence to constitutional principles within the agency.
Political commentator Adam Mockler sharply criticized Fox News host Geraldo Rivera's use of constitutional arguments during a live TV debate. Mockler accused Rivera and Republicans of hypocrisy, citing past actions including the January 6th Capitol attack and heckling during a State of the Union address.
A former ICE attorney has resigned, alleging the agency's training program is "broken" and teaches recruits to violate the Constitution. Ryan Schwank claims essential legal and constitutional training hours were cut, including instruction on the use of force.
