32 articles
Six Democratic senators, led by Tim Kaine and Cory Booker, are demanding public hearings on the conflict in Iran, threatening procedural obstruction. They cite constitutional concerns and a lack of transparency, calling for sworn testimony from top officials. The senators also reflected on the January 6th Capitol attack and the honor due to its police defenders.
President Trump's Iran strikes have fractured the Republican Party, with critics citing a pattern of deception and questioning the 'America First' platform. Prominent conservative voices and analysts highlight growing dissent and the human cost of the conflict, while Democrats grapple with articulating a clear anti-war stance.
President Trump's shifting justifications for the ongoing conflict with Iran have drawn criticism, with the President now claiming a role in selecting the nation's next leader. Iranian officials have responded with defiance, signaling no intention to negotiate. Experts express concern over the lack of a clear strategy and the potential for regional instability.
Democratic lawmakers are challenging Donald Trump's administration over its actions regarding Iran and the Epstein scandal. They cite concerns about an "unlawful war," lack of clear objectives, and potential cover-ups, demanding greater accountability and adherence to constitutional war powers.
A US Congressman criticizes Donald Trump's escalating military actions in Iran, arguing that the former President misunderstands American public opinion, which polls show largely disapproves of the conflict. The ongoing regional tensions, coupled with significant human and financial costs, are fueling calls for congressional oversight.
The U.S. Senate has rejected a measure that would have limited President Trump's war powers concerning military action against Iran. The vote highlights a deep partisan divide, with critics decrying a lack of congressional debate and public input on the escalating conflict.
Calls for President Trump's impeachment have surged following recent military actions against Iran, which the administration itself termed "war." Critics point to the Constitution's Article 1, Section 8, which grants Congress the sole power to declare war, raising questions about executive overreach and accountability.
Senator Chris Van Hollen sharply criticized the Trump administration's rationale for military action against Iran, calling the president "immoral" and accusing the White House of fabricating justifications. He drew parallels to the Iraq War and questioned the escalating costs and unclear objectives of the conflict.
A legal expert has declared the United States to be officially at war with Iran, asserting that current military actions violate both international and US domestic law due to a lack of congressional approval. The conflict is being framed as an "act of aggression" with limited legal recourse for accountability beyond the ballot box.
The US strike on Iran in February 2026 bypassed Congress, leaving the public without clear answers. This analysis delves into the shifting justifications, the constitutional crisis, and the implications for democratic norms and regional stability.
