Cam Johnson Tackles NBA Tanking: A Bold Fix

Utah Jazz forward Cam Johnson has passionately spoken out against NBA tanking, calling it "horrible for the game." He proposes a radical solution: eliminating the draft lottery and giving every non-playoff team an equal chance at the top picks to incentivize competition.

5 days ago
3 min read

Cam Johnson Calls Out NBA Tanking, Proposes Lottery Reform

The specter of tanking, the deliberate act of losing games to secure a higher draft pick, continues to cast a long shadow over the NBA. While the short-term pain of a losing season can be excruciating for fans, the potential long-term rewards – a franchise-altering talent – are undeniable. Utah Jazz forward Cam Johnson, however, is not afraid to speak his mind, vehemently denouncing the practice while simultaneously offering a potentially game-changing solution.

The Double-Edged Sword of Tanking

Johnson doesn’t mince words when describing his feelings about tanking: “Overall, I think tanking is horrible for the game. I hate it.” He champions the importance of fostering a “winning culture and doing things the right way.” Yet, he readily acknowledges the undeniable success stories that have emerged from the ashes of prolonged losing seasons. “I can’t deny the fact that tanking teams, teams that have tanked recently, have swung around and now become very, very good,” Johnson admitted.

He points to recent examples that validate his observation. The Detroit Pistons, after enduring “really rough years,” have transformed into a formidable squad. Similarly, the Houston Rockets, following a complete teardown, are now trending upwards. And then there’s the San Antonio Spurs, who “hit rock bottom,” secured the number one pick, and landed a generational talent in Victor Wembanyama – “an alien, you know?” These examples highlight the allure and, in some cases, the effectiveness of the tanking strategy, even if it pains purists like Johnson.

A Proposed Solution: Equalizing the Lottery Odds

While acknowledging the tangible results of tanking, Johnson is firm in his belief that it’s detrimental to the immediate fan experience and the integrity of the game. “I can’t deny the long-term effects of it, but I don’t like the short-term effects of it,” he stated. His proposed remedy? A radical overhaul of the NBA Draft Lottery system.

“I think maybe the best way to fix it would be to eliminate the draft lottery. all together like or not all together but enhance it and every team that doesn’t make the plan equal chance,” Johnson suggested. The core idea is to remove the significant incentive for teams to intentionally finish lower in the standings. By giving every non-playoff team an equal chance at the top picks, the motivation to “sneak their way out of the plan to go from 10 to 11” would theoretically diminish.

Incentivizing Competition Over Collapse

The current system, Johnson argues, creates a bleak outlook for teams hovering just outside the playoff picture. “The danger, but then you have to incentivize playoffs somehow some way better,” he explained. He questions the current playoff structure’s ability to truly reward competitiveness, especially for teams that might make a “miracle run” through the Play-In Tournament only to face the top seed in the first round. “Like, it’s it’s bleak,” he summarized.

Johnson envisions a scenario where equal lottery odds would naturally encourage a different approach. “If my team is not that great, like I still benefit from building a winning culture and doing things the right way and playing my best players and trying to compete rather than just being like, ‘All right, I want Darren Peterson. I want AJ Deansa. I got to lose these next four games. I got to sit so and so.'” He believes this shift would benefit fan bases, who “want to watch competitive basketball no matter who’s playing.” While some fans might find a perverse enjoyment in the “tanking process where they’re looking forward to the future,” Johnson is convinced that “overall if that lottery odds were more even then the approach would change.”

The Future of Competitive Balance

Cam Johnson’s proposal strikes at the heart of a long-standing debate within the NBA. By advocating for a more equitable distribution of lottery odds, he aims to restore the emphasis on competition and player development throughout the entire season, rather than rewarding strategic failure. Whether the league office will heed his call for reform remains to be seen, but Johnson has certainly ignited a crucial conversation about the health and future of the game.


Source: Cam Johnson TACKLES TANKING and OFFERS SOLUTION to fix it in NBA #nba #utahjazz (YouTube)

Leave a Comment