Trump’s War Plot: Election Stealing Blueprint Revealed

Trump’s War Plot: Election Stealing Blueprint Revealed

A chilling analysis emerges from the Midas Touch Network, suggesting a disturbing nexus between escalating international conflict and a potential domestic plot to subvert American elections. Host Ken Harbaugh, joined by former Republican Congressman Denver Riggleman, dissects a leaked blueprint and a draft executive order, painting a grim picture of a strategy designed to leverage national emergencies to retain power.

The Rationale Swings: From War to Election Security

The conversation begins with the perplexing rationale behind a hypothetical war with Iran, noting the shifting justifications from regime change to thwarting imminent attacks, and then to eliminating a nuclear threat previously deemed neutralized. This inconsistency, Harbaugh argues, serves as a smokescreen for a more ominous objective: laying the groundwork to subvert upcoming elections.

“The Trump regime is laying the groundwork to subvert our elections,” Harbaugh states. “They will accuse foreign powers of trying to interfere and then use that as justification for extraordinary executive powers to protect and secure those elections. This is as Orwellian as it gets.” This strategy, he posits, is driven by the understanding that free and fair elections would end their hold on power.

The Leaked Blueprint and Executive Order: A Playbook for Power

The core of the concern lies in a leaked 17-page blueprint, authored by individuals close to the former president, detailing how to deploy executive powers under the guise of election threats. Riggleman, author of “The Breach,” which chronicled the lead-up to and aftermath of January 6th, confirms this isn’t speculation but a documented plan. His book, released in 2022, served as a warning that those in Trump’s orbit learned from the failed January 6th events and were developing a strategy for future attempts to seize power.

Riggleman reveals the existence of a draft executive order with a specific EO number (13848), indicating a level of official consideration for this strategy. This order, originally signed in September 2018, was intended to address national emergencies related to foreign interference. However, the current draft, as discussed, aims to twist this framework to justify extraordinary actions concerning elections.

“There is now clear and compelling evidence from court cases and forensic analysis that these threats talking about foreign threats in the power in the in the prior paragraph. foreign threats being actually penetrating voting machines have not been mitigated but instead have intensified. That is a specific lie that there is no forensic analysis on earth that rationalizes or proves that there was any coordination or hacking or any overturning of an election in 2020.”

This assertion directly contradicts the findings of numerous court cases and forensic analyses, which found no evidence of widespread fraud or foreign interference sufficient to alter election outcomes in 2020. The draft EO’s language, Riggleman explains, is designed to create a false narrative of an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States,” thereby circumventing standard legal processes.

Historical Context: Echoes of 2020 and January 6th

The conversation draws parallels to the events of 2020 and the January 6th Capitol attack. Riggleman highlights how the narrative of foreign interference was used to pressure Vice President Pence to object to electoral votes, with EO 13848 potentially serving as the background justification for seizing voting machines and nationalizing assets. The involvement of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) in actions like visiting the Fulton County Elections Board is cited as a disturbing precedent, viewed not as a reaction to past events but as a “dry run” for future actions.

The Mechanism of Subversion: Targeting Specific Districts

The strategy, as described, does not necessarily require widespread disruption across all 50 states. Instead, the focus is on targeting specific counties and swing districts. By manipulating outcomes in these key areas, the plan aims to alter the overall election results. This could involve actions such as seizing voting machines or disallowing mail-in ballots in targeted locations.

The leaked blueprint reportedly includes a paragraph that frames the fabricated evidence of foreign interference as an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.” This classification is crucial, as it allows for the suspension of normal legal procedures and the potential deployment of domestic and foreign intelligence assets, or even military actions, under the guise of national security.

Institutional Collapse and the Role of Individual Conscience

Both Harbaugh and Riggleman express deep concern over the perceived collapse of institutional checks and balances. They point to a Supreme Court that has issued immunity rulings perceived as emboldening executive overreach, and a Congress that may be unwilling to act due to political expediency or fear. This leaves a void where the rule of law is expected to prevail.

Given the potential for executive orders to bypass congressional oversight and judicial review, the discussion turns to the ultimate recourse: the conscience and oaths of individuals within the government. Riggleman references the testimony of Ryan Swank, an ICE whistleblower who resigned to speak out against being ordered to violate the Constitution. The hope is that such acts of courage, multiplied thousands of times, could serve as a bulwark against the subversion of electoral will.

Looking Ahead: Planning for the Worst, Hoping for the Best

The conversation concludes with a stark assessment: while hoping for institutions to uphold their responsibilities, it is prudent to plan for the worst. The upcoming period, particularly the days after elections, is anticipated to be rife with “legal chaos” orchestrated by far-right lawyers employing “lawfare” tactics and manufactured data to challenge election results.

Harbaugh offers a potential defense: overwhelming voter turnout. A significant margin of victory, he suggests, would make it far more difficult for claims of widespread fraud or interference to gain traction. This underscores the power of the electorate to safeguard democracy through active participation. The emphasis is on registering, voting, and ensuring that the democratic process is robust enough to withstand such manufactured challenges.

Why This Matters

This analysis is critical because it moves beyond abstract political discourse to reveal a potential, concrete strategy for undermining democratic elections. The intertwining of foreign policy actions with domestic political maneuvering, particularly under the guise of national security, represents a profound threat to the foundations of American governance. Understanding this playbook is essential for citizens, policymakers, and institutions to prepare for and resist attempts to subvert the will of the voters. The historical context of 2020 and January 6th provides a chilling backdrop, suggesting that lessons have been learned not to uphold democratic norms, but to refine methods of challenging them.

Implications, Trends, and Future Outlook

The implications are far-reaching. If such a strategy is indeed deployed, it could lead to widespread disenfranchisement, legal challenges that paralyze government, and a severe erosion of public trust in democratic institutions. The trend toward utilizing executive powers to bypass legislative and judicial checks is concerning, potentially normalizing authoritarian tendencies. The future outlook hinges on the resilience of democratic norms, the courage of individuals within the system, and the active engagement of the citizenry. The possibility of a coordinated effort involving made-up data, lawfare, and the exploitation of executive orders suggests a sophisticated and dangerous approach to challenging election integrity.

Source: Intel Expert WARNS of Trump WAR PLOT to STEAL ELECTION (YouTube)