Trans Veteran Forced Out by Trump Ban Speaks Out

Transgender Navy Commander Shelley Bloomrose was forced to retire after 20 years due to the Trump administration's ban on transgender service members. She spoke out about the financial risks and the demoralizing impact of the policy, which she believes wastes talent and is driven by animus.

3 hours ago
4 min read

Trans Veteran Forced Out by Trump Ban Speaks Out

A decorated U.S. Navy commander, Shelley Bloomrose, who is transgender, was forced into early retirement due to the Trump administration’s ban on transgender military service members. Bloomrose, a lawyer with 20 years of service, was a plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the ban. She spoke out about the personal and financial toll the policy took on her and other service members.

Forced Retirement and Financial Stakes

Bloomrose did not want to retire after two decades of dedicated service. However, she was presented with a stark choice: retire or face involuntary separation processing. This processing carried significant risks to her family and the benefits she had earned. These included her pension, healthcare, and the GI Bill for her son’s college education.

“There was a pension on the line, health care, the GI Bill for my son to go to college, all of those things, which we just couldn’t afford to lose,” Bloomrose stated. “Even though I did not want to retire, I had to, so I did.” This situation highlights the difficult decisions faced by many transgender service members under the ban.

Cost of Training and “Waste” of Talent

Bloomrose, who holds advanced degrees and specialized training, explained the significant investment the U.S. taxpayers made in her career. “You all have paid for me to go to law school. You have paid for me to get a master’s degree in environmental law. You have paid for me to train to go out and support warfighters as a lawyer every year for the past 20 years,” she said.

While she couldn’t give an exact figure, she estimated the cost to be “half a million? More?” The ban affected an estimated 4,000 transgender service members. Bloomrose argued that the administration’s reasoning of the ban being detrimental to force readiness and a waste of money was misguided. She believes it represents a significant waste of American taxpayer investment.

“Across that population, tens of millions, if not a hundred million dollars wasted on training,” she explained. “And we’ve had transgender service members pulled out of deployment simply so they could be fired. It’s nothing to do with their performance, it has nothing to do with their qualifications, it’s simply because they’re transgender.”

Animosity and Lack of Understanding

When asked about the administration’s stance, Bloomrose expressed confusion and hurt. “Why does the Secretary of Defense hate me? I don’t know,” she pondered. She believes the administration is convinced that transgender service members cause disruption, a notion she strongly refutes.

“Transgender service members have been serving to make it one. This is not an issue. Why they’ve chosen to make it one, I don’t know beyond, yes, they seem to hate us,” Bloomrose stated. She emphasized that transgender individuals have been serving effectively without issue for years prior to the ban.

A Once Welcoming Environment Now Hostile

Bloomrose recalled that her decision to live openly as her gender identity was partly enabled by the military being a welcoming environment. She saw the military as a place where she could be herself. However, she noted that this is no longer the case for current service members.

“It’s a different decision for every transgender service member, but it is definitely no longer a welcoming environment,” she said. Those still serving are forced to hide their identities and live in constant fear of discovery. This creates immense demoralization and dehumanization.

“The feeling of demoralization and dehumanization is just, it’s very hard to explain. It is awful. It’s some of the worst feelings I’ve ever had have been around how I’ve been treated by the military and in feeling like I no longer was welcome in a place that I thought I belonged,” Bloomrose shared.

Broader Attacks on the Trans Community

The conversation also touched upon other policy decisions targeting the transgender community across the country, such as bathroom bills. Bloomrose mentioned the case of transgender activist Samantha Boucher, who deliberately defied a Kansas law that criminalizes bathroom use based on gender assigned at birth.

Bloomrose found it striking that using a public restroom could become an act of bravery. She expressed frustration with the current climate, stating, “I find myself, you know, here is a middle-aged woman. I have a list of states that I won’t travel. I think it is insane that I live in a country where I don’t go to certain places like Kansas or Florida because they’ve made it very clear that I am not welcome there.”

She stressed that concerns about using public restrooms should not be a political issue. “It shouldn’t be an act of political courage,” Bloomrose concluded.

Looking Ahead

Bloomrose’s forced retirement underscores the human cost of discriminatory policies. As legal challenges to such bans continue and societal attitudes evolve, the experiences of veterans like Bloomrose will remain crucial in shaping future military policies and broader public understanding. The focus will likely remain on ensuring that all qualified individuals can serve their country without fear of prejudice.


Source: “Why does the Secretary of Defense hate me?” Trans veteran speaks out on Trump’s military ban (YouTube)

Written by

Joshua D. Ovidiu

I enjoy writing.

13,536 articles published
Leave a Comment