Sheriff Faces Pressure After No-Confidence Vote

Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos faces calls to resign after a union representing hundreds of deputies voted no confidence in his leadership. The scrutiny intensifies amid the ongoing, stalled investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. Nanos's past suspensions from a previous law enforcement role are also under review, with supervisors questioning his transparency.

2 days ago
3 min read

Sheriff Under Fire Amidst Investigation and No-Confidence Vote

Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos is facing significant pressure to resign. A union representing hundreds of his deputies recently voted no confidence in his leadership. This situation has escalated, with some county supervisors also calling for his resignation. The scrutiny comes as the sheriff’s department leads the ongoing investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie, a case that has now stretched for 53 days with no arrests or solid leads.

Union Votes Against Sheriff’s Leadership

The Pima County Sheriff’s Deputies Association, which includes 306 deputies, reportedly held a vote where all members expressed a lack of confidence in Sheriff Nanos. This represents a large majority, as there are about 400 deputies in total within the Pima County Sheriff’s Office. Such a widespread vote of no confidence is unusual and signals deep dissatisfaction among the rank-and-file members of the department.

Past Conduct Under Scrutiny

Adding to the controversy, Sheriff Nanos’s past work history is being re-examined. Before joining the Pima County Sheriff’s Office, he worked for the Rollout Power Pass OPD decades ago. During his time there, records show he was suspended as many as eight times. Supervisors have stated that these suspensions were for various reasons, including use of force incidents and tardiness. One incident allegedly involved someone ending up in the hospital, with claims of assault.

Allegations of Withholding Information

A key point of concern for the supervisors is that Sheriff Nanos apparently did not disclose these past suspensions when he was questioned under oath. Supervisors believe that if this history had been known when he was hired, he might not have been considered for the position. They view his past record as troubling and indicative of poor judgment.

Calls for Resignation and Recall Efforts

Pima County Supervisors, including Matt Heinz, have publicly stated their concerns and are urging Sheriff Nanos to step down. They argue that he covered up his suspension history. Combined with the lack of progress in the Nancy Guthrie investigation, these supervisors believe it is time for new leadership. There are also ongoing efforts to initiate a recall election, which could lead to a special election to put the sheriff’s position up for a vote.

Why This Reshapes the Local Order

This situation highlights a breakdown in trust between the sheriff, his deputies, and county leadership. The widespread no-confidence vote from the union suggests serious management issues within the department. The re-examination of the sheriff’s past conduct raises questions about accountability and transparency in law enforcement hiring. The ongoing investigation into a high-profile missing person case, with no clear answers after nearly two months, further intensifies the public and official dissatisfaction.

Historical Context

Votes of no confidence against elected officials are rare but not unheard of. They typically occur when there is a significant loss of faith in leadership, often stemming from perceived incompetence or ethical breaches. Recall elections are a mechanism in some jurisdictions to remove elected officials before their term ends, providing a way for voters or governing bodies to address widespread dissatisfaction.

Economic and Social Impact

While not directly economic in the way sanctions or trade deals are, the turmoil in the sheriff’s office can have ripple effects. Public trust in law enforcement is crucial for community safety and cooperation. A department facing internal division and external criticism may struggle to perform its duties effectively. This can impact the community’s sense of security and its willingness to engage with law enforcement, especially in sensitive investigations like the Nancy Guthrie case.

Future Scenarios

Several outcomes are possible. Sheriff Nanos could resign, leading to a special election or appointment of a new sheriff. Alternatively, he could fight to remain in office, potentially leading to a contentious recall election. The outcome will significantly shape the future of law enforcement in Pima County and the direction of the Nancy Guthrie investigation.


Source: Sheriff leading Nancy Guthrie search facing calls to resign | Elizabeth Vargas Reports (YouTube)

Written by

Joshua D. Ovidiu

I enjoy writing.

10,866 articles published
Leave a Comment