Prediction Markets Profit From U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Deal
Prediction markets, where users bet on future events, are facing scrutiny after users reportedly profited significantly from the U.S.-Iran ceasefire. Concerns about insider trading are growing as platforms like Polymarket see increased activity and large payouts.
Prediction Markets Make Headlines Amid U.S.-Iran Ceasefire
Prediction markets, platforms where users bet on future events, are once again in the spotlight following the recent U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement. Reports indicate a surge in activity on platforms like Polymarket, with some users reportedly earning significant sums. The Associated Press highlighted that new Polymarket accounts appeared in the hours before the deal was announced, raising concerns about potential insider trading.
How Prediction Markets Work
Prediction markets function like stock exchanges for potential future outcomes. Users can buy and sell ‘shares’ representing the likelihood of a specific event occurring. For example, if a market asks whether the U.S. will confirm the existence of aliens by December 31st, users can buy ‘yes’ shares. If the event happens, these shares pay out their face value, offering a profit. The price of a share reflects the market’s collective belief in that outcome. On Polymarket, a ‘yes’ share for the alien confirmation question was trading at 18 cents. Buying 100 shares for $18 would yield $100 if the U.S. confirmed aliens by year’s end, resulting in an $82 profit.
Real-World Betting Examples
These platforms cover a vast range of topics, from politics and pop culture to sports and current events. Polymarket even offered markets on whether traffic through the Strait of Hormuz would return to normal, though some conflict-related markets are blocked for U.S. users. A notable example involved a market on how many times President Trump would mention specific Iran-related terms during a press conference. Trump used the word ‘Iran’ or ‘Iranian’ 38 times, meaning those who bet on ‘yes’ for 15 or more mentions won their wagers.
Explosive Growth and Growing Scrutiny
Prediction markets have experienced rapid growth, with one report noting a 400% spike in trading volume between 2024 and 2025. However, this popularity has brought increased scrutiny. Polymarket faced criticism after initially listing a market on the rescue timeline for downed U.S. airmen, which it later removed. The platform argues that the ‘wisdom of the crowd’ it offers is valuable, especially during difficult times. Competitor Kalshi states it bans death-related bets. Kalshi also refunded users after Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s death, admitting their guidance could have been clearer.
Insider Trading Concerns Mount
Significant profits made on timely bets have fueled insider trading concerns. One anonymous user reportedly bet $32,000 on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro being out of power by the end of January, netting over $400,000. More recently, an analysis by The New York Times found that at least 16 Polymarket accounts profited by over $100,000 each on bets predicting U.S. strikes on Iran. These bets were placed unusually close to the actual events. While there is no direct public evidence linking these trades to individuals within the Trump administration, the timing raises suspicion. Stephen Peepgrass, a gaming regulation attorney, noted that such timing is a key factor investigators consider when looking into potential wrongdoing.
Regulatory Challenges and Congressional Action
In the U.S., prediction markets are regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Kalshi is fully regulated by the CFTC. While Polymarket has a regulated U.S. exchange, many of its markets are based offshore, allowing for anonymous trading. This anonymity can make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to identify who is behind specific trades. Both platforms have rules against insider trading and are introducing new measures to prevent it. However, some members of Congress believe these efforts are insufficient. Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley is proposing legislation to establish clearer rules for prediction markets, criticizing both the Trump administration’s regulatory approach and the CFTC’s oversight. He expressed a lack of confidence in current regulatory bodies, suggesting a tendency to allow these markets to operate with fewer restrictions.
Industry Ties and Future Outlook
Kalshi supports stricter federal oversight on insider trading. Polymarket did not respond to inquiries for this report. In a past interview, Polymarket’s CEO described the Trump administration as supportive of prediction markets. Notably, Donald Trump Jr., the president’s son, serves as an unpaid advisor and investor for Polymarket and also advises Kalshi. The ongoing debate over regulation and the potential for misuse of information highlight the evolving challenges in overseeing these rapidly growing platforms. Future developments will likely focus on how regulatory bodies and lawmakers address concerns about market integrity and the prevention of insider trading.
Source: Polymarket accounts cash in on U.S.-Iran ceasefire (YouTube)





