Pam Bondi’s DOJ Portrait Found in Trash, House Demands Testimony
Pam Bondi's DOJ portrait was found discarded in a trash bin, as House lawmakers demand her testimony regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Despite her departure from the Attorney General's office, a valid subpoena requires her appearance to explain the DOJ's actions and document withholding.
Pam Bondi’s DOJ Portrait Discovered in Trash Bin
A portrait of former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, once displayed at the Department of Justice (DOJ), has been found discarded in a trash bin. News outlet MSNBC obtained a photograph of the portrait in the trash, signaling a significant development in the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Bondi’s role in the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files.
House Lawmakers Insist on Bondi’s Testimony
Despite the discovery of her portrait, House lawmakers are determined to have Pam Bondi testify before the House Oversight Committee. Ranking member Robert Garcia stated that Bondi “will not escape accountability” and remains “legally obligated to appear before our committee under oath.” The committee is investigating how the DOJ handled the Epstein Files Transparency Act, with concerns raised about potential violations of survivors’ privacy and safety. Lawmakers also question the department’s withholding of millions of pages of documents on privilege grounds, which they argue are not recognized by the act.
Subpoena Remains Valid, Experts Say
Legal experts suggest that a subpoena issued to Pam Bondi for her testimony likely remains valid, even if she is no longer the Attorney General. Lisa Rubin, a legal analyst, explained that compelling a private citizen can sometimes be easier. However, she noted that Bondi could still argue that certain communications are protected by executive or deliberative process privilege. These arguments would hold regardless of her current employment status, as they relate to her actions while in office and interactions with the previous administration.
The subpoena would require a formal vote by the committee to be withdrawn or altered. Given the ongoing investigation and the lack of any official statements to the contrary, the expectation is that Bondi is still required to appear and provide explanations regarding the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files.
Concerns Over Document Release and Withholding
The controversy centers on the DOJ’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. While the department announced the release of 3 million pages, it also revealed that an additional 2.5 million pages were withheld. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who has since become acting Attorney General, confirmed this withholding on privilege grounds. Lawmakers, including Robert Garcia and Republican members of the Oversight Committee, want to understand the basis for this decision and why these specific grounds were used.
Epstein Case Becomes Political Liability
The ongoing Epstein scandal has become a significant political challenge, with reports suggesting that former President Trump views it as a public relations nightmare. This perspective may have influenced the decision to move Bondi away from her role. Stuart Stevens, a political strategist, described the situation as a “complete breakdown” and a “shambles.” He questioned the willingness of individuals like Todd Blanche to engage in actions that could damage their reputation, suggesting it stems from a desire to maintain power.
Stevens also commented on the broader implications for the justice system, noting that norms are being eroded. He argued that when Democrats regain power, they must actively prosecute those who have abused the system, rather than simply aiming to return to a previous state. This sentiment, he noted, is echoed by voters who seek accountability, not just a turning of the page.
What’s Next for the Investigation?
The focus now shifts to whether Pam Bondi will comply with the subpoena and appear before the House Oversight Committee. Her testimony is crucial for shedding light on the DOJ’s actions regarding the Epstein files. The committee’s continued pursuit of her testimony, coupled with the public discovery of her portrait, suggests that this investigation is far from over. The outcome could have significant implications for transparency within the Department of Justice and accountability for how sensitive information is handled.
Source: Pam Bondi’s DOJ Portrait Discovered in the Trash (YouTube)





