Military Leaders Quietly Resist Illegal War Orders

Military Leaders Quietly Resist Illegal War Orders

New reports suggest that some top military leaders are growing concerned about following potentially illegal orders. While former President Trump has made threats about Iran on social media, military officials at CENTCOM (U.S. Central Command) are reportedly worried about carrying out unlawful commands. This has led to what one retired general describes as “quiet resistance” to requests that might target civilian areas or infrastructure.

Concerns Over Civilian Targets

According to retired Army General Randy Manor, speaking on MSNBC, he has heard that military planners are pushing back against orders that could be considered war crimes. Manor explained that if a request comes in to bomb a bridge that is clearly used by civilians, the planners at CENTCOM would likely redirect the order. Instead of targeting civilian infrastructure, they would aim for military targets.

“The idea of attacking bridges that are clearly overwhelmingly for civilian use would be a war crime and the planners and sitcom would not permit that,” General Manor stated.

This “quiet resistance” involves subtly steering directives toward legitimate military objectives. Manor suggested that this approach is being used because some leaders, like Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, might not fully grasp the complexities of modern warfare or the laws surrounding it. The implication is that these military professionals are trying to uphold their duty without being fired.

The Law of War and Accountability

CENTCOM is a major command responsible for U.S. military operations in the Middle East and parts of Asia. Its commanders are aware that targeting civilian infrastructure is illegal under international law. This understanding is why the retired general believes that even direct orders from President Trump, if deemed illegal, would not be carried out.

The U.S. military has its own legal systems, including courts-martial, to handle violations of military law. History shows that military members have been prosecuted for actions like torture, even when there was a Justice Department memo suggesting legality. This indicates that the military itself can hold individuals accountable for illegal acts, regardless of political pressure.

Historical Precedent: Nixon Era

This situation draws parallels to the end of President Nixon’s term. Concerns arose about Nixon’s mental state and his ability to make sound decisions. The then-Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State reportedly developed a plan to ensure that any order for a nuclear attack would require consultation with them, effectively creating a safeguard against a potentially erratic commander-in-chief.

Nixon himself had reportedly made comments to a senator about his ability to cause mass destruction with a phone call. This historical event highlights a recurring concern: the potential for a president to misuse their authority, and the measures military leaders might take to prevent catastrophic actions. The current calls for invoking the 25th Amendment against Trump echo these past anxieties about presidential stability and decision-making.

Impeachment Efforts Against Austin

In light of these concerns, articles of impeachment have been filed against Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. Congresswoman Jasmine Ansari introduced the impeachment articles, citing Austin’s alleged disregard for the Constitution and his role in directing military actions that could be considered war crimes. She specifically mentioned threats against Iranian civilian infrastructure, including potential attacks on hospitals, schools, and bridges.

Ansari argued that Austin has violated his oath of office by failing to uphold the law and respect the separation of powers. The impeachment effort underscores the gravity of the situation and the belief that top military officials must be held accountable for any actions that cross legal or ethical lines.

Shifting Voices in Conservative Media

Interestingly, some conservative voices, like former Fox News host Megyn Kelly, have begun to criticize Trump’s rhetoric regarding Iran. While Kelly has previously defended Trump, her recent comments suggest a growing unease with his aggressive stance and threats. This shift, even from a prominent MAGA supporter, could signal a broader change in public opinion among some Republican voters.

The influence of right-wing media personalities is significant. When figures like Tucker Carlson or Megyn Kelly begin to question or oppose Trump’s actions, it can influence their audience. This could potentially lead more Republicans to speak out against policies or statements they find problematic, offering a glimmer of hope for more independent thinking within the party.

Why This Matters

The core issue here is the rule of law and the integrity of military command. Military leaders are bound by a code that prioritizes lawful orders. The reports of “quiet resistance” suggest that the system of checks and balances within the military may be functioning, even under pressure. It shows that individuals in positions of power are aware of their responsibility to prevent illegal actions, even if it means indirectly defying a superior.

This also highlights the importance of civilian oversight and the constitutional role of Congress in declaring war. The potential for a president to act unilaterally or issue dangerous orders is a constant concern. The actions of military leaders, the impeachment efforts, and the shifting media landscape all point to a critical moment where accountability and adherence to the law are being tested.

Future Outlook

The future will likely see continued scrutiny of military actions and presidential directives. If these reports of resistance are accurate, it suggests a military establishment that is committed to its legal and ethical obligations. However, the pressure on these individuals will remain immense.

The ongoing impeachment proceedings against Austin, if they proceed, will set an important precedent. Furthermore, the willingness of figures like Megyn Kelly to voice criticism could influence public discourse and potentially impact future elections. The balance between executive authority and the rule of law remains a central theme in American governance, and these events underscore its fragility and importance.

Source: TOP Military Leaders REBEL Against TRUMP ORDERS?! (YouTube)