Iran’s Missile Threat to Europe: ‘Not Particularly Serious,’ Says Expert

Experts assess Iran's missile threat to Europe as minimal, despite recent launches. The situation highlights strategic messaging amid geopolitical tensions and warns of broader economic impacts from disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.

6 days ago
4 min read

Iran’s Missile Reach Questioned Amid Geopolitical Tensions

Recent claims by Israel suggest Iran possesses missile capabilities that could reach as far as Paris or London. These assertions follow an incident where Iran reportedly fired two missiles at a British military base in Diego Garcia, an act intelligence sources described as a warning to Europe. However, experts caution against overstating the immediate military threat.

Expert Analysis of Iranian Missile Capabilities

Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow at Rusei specializing in air power and technology, addressed the reliability of these claims. He noted that Iran’s recent missile launches towards Diego Garcia demonstrate an ability to modify existing ballistic missiles with ranges around 2,000 kilometers. These could include variants of the Shahab 3 or repurposed space launch vehicles like the Simorg.

Despite this demonstrated capability, Bronk emphasized that the numbers involved are likely to be very small. He also pointed out a crucial detail: the missiles missed their target. “Could they potentially put a rocket of some description to impact somewhere at roughly the sort of ranges to hit London or Paris or that kind of area? Maybe,” Bronk stated. “But probably very small numbers and I I don’t think it’s a particularly serious military threat.”

Strategic Messaging and European Involvement

The timing of these claims, particularly from Israeli sources, is viewed by some as a strategic move. Bronk suggested it could be a cynical attempt to broaden the coalition involved in operations against Iran, especially if current efforts are not meeting expectations. “This is a very very clear attempt to try and widen the number of countries that are participating in the Israeli US operation against Iran,” he explained.

The message to European nations, Bronk believes, is that they are also within the potential line of fire and should therefore offer assistance. This approach is seen as unsubtle but perhaps not entirely unexpected, given past requests from the White House for direct European involvement. So far, many allies, including Gulf states, have limited their direct participation despite facing significant pressure.

Iran’s Balancing Act: Warnings and Covert Actions

Bronk described Iran’s current posture as a delicate balancing act. On one hand, there’s a tacit warning to European capitals about potential, albeit limited, retaliatory strikes if they become more involved. On the other hand, Iran’s actual desire to strike European targets appears minimal, as further escalation could invite more countries to join operations against them.

While overt ballistic missile strikes are considered unlikely, Bronk highlighted Iran’s capacity for more covert actions. This could involve deploying operative cells in Europe to target military installations. Such actions would be deniable and less likely to provoke public outcry for government intervention, serving instead as a discreet warning to European politicians. “So I think that’s the balance,” Bronk concluded.

US Response and Potential Retaliation

The discussion also touched upon former US President Donald Trump’s warning about potentially destroying Iranian power plants if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened. Bronk confirmed that the US possesses the capability to carry out such an attack swiftly and effectively, largely due to existing air superiority over Iran.

He noted that a US strike on Iran’s power grid could be executed far more efficiently than Russia’s campaign against Ukrainian infrastructure. However, Bronk questioned the ultimate effectiveness of such a move, suggesting it would cause significant suffering within Iran without necessarily achieving its strategic objectives, especially if the Iranian leadership is indifferent to their population’s well-being.

Global Economic Impact: The Strait of Hormuz Disruption

The ongoing conflict and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz have led to soaring oil prices. David Uberti, a markets reporter at the Wall Street Journal, described the situation as an “elaborate game of hide and seek.” The Strait is a critical chokepoint, handling about 15% of global oil and natural gas supplies, vital for Europe and Asia.

Currently, tanker traffic has slowed significantly, impacting not only Iranian exports but also those from major producers like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and the UAE. This has raised concerns about a prolonged energy shock. The strategic question remains how quickly these vital trade routes can be reopened and global exports restored.

Industries and Consumers Feel the Pinch

The energy disruption affects various sectors, particularly energy-intensive industries like chemicals in Europe and Asia, and the automotive industry in the United States. Ordinary consumers worldwide are also feeling the effects through higher prices for gasoline and natural gas used for heating and power generation.

Uberti warned that the full economic and financial impacts might not be immediately apparent on consumer bills but are likely to be felt over the coming weeks and months. He highlighted a growing divide in the US, where rising energy costs disproportionately affect working-class and lower-income individuals, potentially exacerbating economic inequalities.

Political Ramifications and the Russian Advantage

The situation presents a complex political landscape in the United States, with differing views on foreign intervention. Historically, Donald Trump campaigned on a non-interventionist foreign policy, and the current events represent a significant shift from that platform.

Meanwhile, the ongoing global instability appears to benefit Russia. Despite Western sanctions, Russia’s economy, heavily reliant on energy revenues, stands to gain from increased global oil and natural gas prices. The conflict also serves as a significant distraction from the ongoing war in Ukraine, potentially easing pressure on Russia’s military and economic fronts.


Source: Iran Could Hit Europe, But Threat ‘Not Particularly Serious’ | Justin Bronk (YouTube)

Written by

Joshua D. Ovidiu

I enjoy writing.

11,008 articles published
Leave a Comment