Ex-Intel Officer Labels US Actions in Iran as Terrorism

Ex-Intel Officer Labels US Actions in Iran as Terrorism

A former U.S. Army intelligence officer has delivered a powerful speech, directly accusing the United States of engaging in terrorism. Josephine Gilbo, who served for 17 years and held high-level intelligence roles, spoke out against what she calls an unlawful war in Iran. She used her experience and official definitions to make her case, drawing a stark contrast between U.S. policy and its stated values.

Defining Terrorism, Applying It to U.S. Actions

Gilbo began by defining terrorism as the planned use of violence against civilians to achieve political goals. She then applied this definition to recent U.S. military actions in Iran. Specifically, she pointed to an attack on an elementary school in Minab that killed 165 young girls. Gilbo stated that the U.S. military’s actions, like bombing schools while leaders like Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth boast about it, fit this definition of terrorism.

Her background lends significant weight to her claims. Gilbo worked with top intelligence agencies, including the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), and the National Security Agency (NSA). She also served as a counterterrorism officer in the U.S. Army. This extensive experience means she understands the inner workings of military and intelligence operations.

The Minab School Attack: A Case Study

Gilbo detailed the tragic attack on the school in Minab. She explained that modern missiles have cameras and that intelligence agencies collect real-time satellite imagery. This technology would have clearly shown the school, with its colorful murals and children playing outside. Despite this clear visual evidence, a Tomahawk missile fired from the USS Pinckney struck the school. When children fled to a prayer room, a second strike hit there, killing 163 girls. A third strike hit nearby.

She questioned the process, noting that U.S. military operations require multiple sources, including intelligence reports and U.S. officials, to confirm targets. This is meant to ensure accuracy and prevent errors. However, Gilbo highlighted that after the Minab attack, the USS Pinckney conducted resupply missions for its weapons without any apparent pause for review or investigation. No one was called to Congress to explain the bombing of a school.

Gilbo stated, “By our own definition of terrorism, and I can say this as a former counterterrorist officer, we are the terrorists. We are the bad guys.”

Questioning the War’s Purpose and Leadership

Gilbo also raised serious questions about the current military deployment in the region. She mentioned that units like the USS Tripoli, USS Boxer, and the 82nd Airborne Division are being sent into a conflict with Iran that lacks clear objectives. She suggested that the push to attack Iran is driven by political motivations, such as Donald Trump’s desire to appease Benjamin Netanyahu. Gilbo also criticized Trump’s shifting stances on international policy, including his comments on deals with Iran and his criticism of NATO.

She expressed deep concern for the young troops being sent into what she believes is a dangerous and pointless conflict. Gilbo referred to them as pawns, being sacrificed for the ambitions of a few. She lamented that no matter how loudly people speak out, it may not be enough to save these soldiers.

A Direct Plea to Military Commanders

In a powerful direct address, Gilbo called on Captain Patrick J. Sullivan of the USS Tripoli to turn his ship around. She urged him not to follow what she believes are unlawful orders. Gilbo stressed that there is no congressional authorization for this war. She warned Captain Sullivan that he would be complicit in war crimes and the deaths of his own Marines if he proceeded.

The speaker who shared Gilbo’s speech emphasized its emotional impact. He felt it was a crucial message that needed to be heard. He encouraged viewers to subscribe to his channel to help him reach a larger audience and share more important content.

Why This Matters

This speech brings a critical perspective to the ongoing discussions about U.S. foreign policy and military actions. By using the official definition of terrorism and her own expertise, Gilbo challenges the narrative that the U.S. is always the force for good. Her focus on the civilian casualties, particularly the young girls killed in the school bombing, highlights the devastating human cost of war. The speech forces us to consider whether U.S. actions abroad align with its stated values and international laws. It also raises questions about accountability within the military and intelligence communities when errors or alleged war crimes occur.

Historical Context and Future Outlook

The U.S. has a long history of military involvement in the Middle East, often justified by national security interests or the fight against terrorism. However, these interventions have frequently led to complex and prolonged conflicts, civilian casualties, and accusations of human rights violations. The current situation with Iran, marked by rising tensions and potential military escalation, echoes past conflicts. Gilbo’s speech taps into a growing public unease about endless wars and the justifications for military action. Her call for troops and commanders to refuse unlawful orders is a serious one, harkening back to ethical dilemmas faced by military personnel throughout history. The future outlook depends heavily on diplomatic efforts, congressional oversight, and public pressure. If conflicts escalate without clear objectives or legal backing, voices like Gilbo’s are likely to become more prominent, challenging the established order and demanding greater transparency and accountability from those in power.

Source: Trump gets PUBLIC WARNING by US INTELLIGENCE OFFICER!! (YouTube)