Conservative Leader Urges VP Vance to Remove President

Conservative Leader Urges VP Vance to Remove President

A prominent voice from within conservative media is calling for Vice President J.D. Vance to take an extraordinary step: using the 25th Amendment to remove the current president from office. Scott McConnell, co-founder of The American Conservative, recently published his thoughts. He advised Vance to publicly support invoking the 25th Amendment. McConnell also suggested Vance announce he wouldn’t run for president in 2028. This move, he argued, would help ensure a smoother transition and allow Vance to explain the necessity of the action through media access.

McConnell’s suggestion includes a specific instruction for Vance: appoint an anti-war Democrat as his vice president. He described this potential appointee as smart and not “super woke.” The phrase “super woke” often sparks debate. To many, it means wanting everyone to live their lives freely without oppression. However, some conservatives have used it negatively. McConnell seems to be adding a jab at the left with this description, prompting questions about the word’s actual meaning.

Understanding the 25th Amendment

The 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution deals with presidential disability and succession. Specifically, Section 4 allows the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet to declare the President unable to discharge the powers and duties of their office. If the President contests this, Congress ultimately decides. However, the process must start with the Vice President. Congress cannot initiate it on its own.

In this scenario, the speaker emphasizes that the 25th Amendment cannot be invoked without Vice President J.D. Vance’s agreement. The speaker believes Vance will not take this action, calling him a “coward.” Yet, the speaker also suggests this is the only way for Vance to save his political future. The argument is that any association with the current administration could harm his chances in future elections.

A Path to Redemption?

The speaker presents a dramatic idea: Vance could become a hero by invoking the 25th Amendment. This is compared to how some figures, like Liz Cheney, gained support by opposing the president. The speaker believes Democrats might even support Vance in a future election if he takes this step. However, the speaker admits this doesn’t reflect well on those Democrats and believes this scenario is unlikely to happen.

The frustration is clear that this call for action is not being taken seriously by Vance. The speaker feels that Vance should constantly be reminded of this missed opportunity. The idea is that wherever Vance goes, he should be questioned about why he didn’t act. Reporters should ask him, and even strangers in public should confront him. This persistent reminder, the speaker suggests, should serve as a permanent mark on his career.

The Broader Implications

The fact that a conservative publication is calling for the 25th Amendment’s use is seen as significant. It shows that concerns about the president’s fitness are not limited to one political side. However, the practical reality is that Vice President Vance is unlikely to act on this advice. The speaker concludes that this missed chance will and should follow Vance throughout his public life.

Why This Matters

This discussion highlights a deep division within the country and even within political parties. It brings to light questions about presidential leadership and the mechanisms available to address concerns about a president’s ability to govern. The 25th Amendment, though rarely invoked, represents a constitutional tool for extreme circumstances. The fact that it’s being discussed by figures within the president’s own political sphere indicates a level of concern that transcends typical partisan criticism.

Future Outlook

The immediate future likely holds no action regarding the 25th Amendment. However, the conversation itself is noteworthy. It suggests that internal party pressures and public opinion can influence how political figures are perceived and judged. For J.D. Vance, the speaker believes this moment, whether he acts or not, will define his political identity and future prospects. The speaker’s strong opinion suggests that the debate over presidential fitness and the role of the Vice President will continue to be a topic of public discussion.

Source: Trump UNDER FIRE, New Calls For IMMEDIATE REMOVAL (YouTube)