AI Will Plan Your Trips with Google Maps
Google's new 'Ask Maps' feature uses AI to help plan your life, while a tech policy expert argues cookie banners are broken and should be removed. Learn about the future of AI-powered navigation and the debate over online privacy tools.
AI Steps In to Plan Your Life with Google Maps
Google is rolling out a new feature called ‘Ask Maps’ that uses AI to help plan your real-world adventures. Imagine telling your phone you want to visit a new museum, try a specific type of cuisine, or find a unique shop, and having Google Maps, powered by Gemini AI, suggest the best routes and places to go. This exciting development aims to make navigating your life and exploring new places much simpler.
The ‘Ask Maps’ feature is designed to be your personal travel assistant. Instead of just searching for a destination, you can have a conversation with the AI about your plans. For example, you could say, “I want to go on a scenic hike this weekend and end up at a brewery.” Gemini, integrated into Google Maps, would then use its understanding of your request to suggest suitable trails and nearby breweries, even considering factors like travel time and popularity.
This AI-powered planning goes beyond simple directions. It taps into Google’s vast knowledge base, including reviews, business information, and real-time data, to offer personalized recommendations. The goal is to reduce the friction of planning outings, making it easier for people to discover and experience new things in their cities and beyond.
The Cookie Banner Crisis: Why We Need to Say Goodbye
Beyond the future of AI-powered navigation, the conversation also turned to a persistent annoyance of the internet: cookie banners. Professor Kate Clough, an expert in tech policy, argues passionately that these pop-up notices, which ask for your consent to use website cookies, are not only irritating but also fundamentally broken. She believes they do more harm than good and should be removed entirely.
Cookie banners became widespread following regulations like Europe’s GDPR. The idea was to inform users about data collection and give them a choice. However, Clough explains that over time, these banners have become a bureaucratic hurdle rather than a genuine privacy tool. Most users, overwhelmed by legal jargon and the desire to simply access a website, click ‘agree’ without understanding the implications.
Clough likens cookies to digital breadcrumbs that help websites function, but the ability to track user behavior online using these cookies has become incredibly valuable for advertising. The problem, she states, is that the banners designed to give users control have devolved into a system of ‘manufactured consent.’ This system satisfies the letter of the law for companies but offers little real transparency or protection for users.
A History of Annoyance
The history of cookie banners, Clough explains, stretches back about 15 to 25 years. Early concerns about online advertising and data tracking, especially after major acquisitions in the early 2000s, led to regulations in Europe. While the intention was to protect user privacy, the implementation through banners has been problematic. Industry lobbyists and legal interpretations have shaped these banners into the confusing interfaces we see today.
Clough argues that the current system is a stalemate. Regulators feel they’ve addressed privacy concerns because users click the banners, and companies have invested in compliance, making them unwilling to seek new solutions. This situation prevents any real innovation in how user privacy is managed online.
Why We’d Be Better Off Without Them
Clough’s boldest claim is that removing cookie banners altogether would actually improve the online experience and user privacy. She believes that the constant, meaningless clicking of ‘agree’ creates a false sense of security. By eliminating these banners, the internet would be forced to have new, more meaningful conversations about privacy, potentially leading to better regulations and product designs.
She suggests that new approaches could include browser-level solutions, more honest discussions about the harms of non-personally identifiable data sharing, or even economic models where users are directly compensated for their data. The key is to move beyond the current system of ‘manufactured consent’ and explore innovative ways to empower users.
Looking Ahead: Will Change Come?
There’s a glimmer of hope, as the EU is reportedly re-evaluating its policies around data protection, partly due to the rise of AI. The current cookie banner system seems increasingly unviable as AI integrates more deeply into web browsing. Clough remains cautiously optimistic that genuine change is possible, pushing for solutions that truly serve the end-user and citizen, rather than just ticking regulatory boxes.
Specs & Key Features
- Ask Maps with Gemini AI: Allows conversational planning for real-world activities using Google Maps.
- Personalized Recommendations: Leverages AI and Google’s data to suggest routes, places, and activities.
- Cookie Banners: Discussed as a flawed system for user privacy consent online.
- Proposed Solutions: Removal of banners, new regulations, browser-level tools, user compensation models.
Who Should Care?
Anyone who uses Google Maps for planning outings or exploring new places will be interested in the ‘Ask Maps’ feature. It promises a more intuitive and helpful way to discover the world around you. Additionally, anyone frustrated by the constant barrage of cookie banners and concerned about online privacy should pay attention to the arguments for their removal and the potential for new privacy solutions.
Availability
‘Ask Maps’ is a new feature being rolled out by Google. Availability may vary by region and device. Information on the specific timeline for the wider release of the ‘Ask Maps’ feature was not provided.
Source: Would you let Gemini tell you where to go? | The Vergecast (YouTube)





