Ex-FBI Chief Comey Subpoenaed in Trump Probe

Comey Subpoenaed in Wide-Ranging Conspiracy Probe

Former FBI Director James Comey has been served with a subpoena demanding documents related to his involvement in the Russia investigation and other matters during his tenure as FBI chief. The subpoena is reportedly being handled out of Fort Pierce, Florida, by a special grand jury now under the purview of Judge Eileen Cannon. Judge Cannon previously presided over the classified documents case involving former President Donald Trump and issued several rulings seen as favorable to Trump.

Unusual Legal Theory Drives Investigation

Sources familiar with the matter suggest the investigation is based on a broad and unusual theory. This theory posits that various investigations into Donald Trump, starting with the Russia probe and continuing through the Ukraine impeachment, January 6th events, and special counsel inquiries, are all interconnected and part of a larger criminal conspiracy. This expansive view aims to link all these past events as part of a single, ongoing criminal investigation.

Critics Call Probe ‘Nonsense’ and Politically Motivated

Legal experts and commentators have strongly criticized the subpoena and the underlying investigation. “I see nothing legitimate here,” stated one commentator, suggesting the probe is designed to create a perception of criminality around Trump’s perceived adversaries. The goal, according to critics, is to impose financial and reputational costs on individuals like Comey, even if the legal basis is considered weak or “crazy nonsense” by many.

This sentiment is echoed by former federal prosecutor Ken Kadosh, who noted that Comey is unlikely to possess relevant documents, having been a private citizen for many years. The effort is seen by some as an attempt to weaponize the Justice Department against political opponents, a tactic they claim has been employed since Trump’s inauguration.

Resignations Signal Deep Concerns

Adding to the controversy, federal prosecutors have reportedly resigned from the probe, refusing to participate further. This is considered an extraordinary signal within the legal community, suggesting deep reservations about the investigation’s legitimacy and political motivations. “It’s a very, very strong signal that this is a bunch of nonsense that’s being spun up for political purposes,” Kadosh remarked.

Resource Drain and Opportunity Costs

The investigation also raises concerns about the allocation of limited federal prosecutorial resources. Every investigation undertaken means fewer resources are available for other critical cases. “Federal prosecutors have limited resources, and every time you start an investigation, you are incurring opportunity costs in the form of the things that you are not paying attention to,” Kadosh explained. This grand conspiracy probe diverts attention and manpower from other pressing legal matters.

Trump’s Fed Chair Comments Criticized

In a separate but related development, former President Trump has publicly suggested that the Justice Department’s criminal probe into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell should continue. Powell is reportedly being investigated because he has not lowered interest rates as Trump desired. A judge had previously described this investigation as a “pretext,” indicating a lack of legitimate grounds.

Critics argue that Trump’s desire to pressure Powell is counterproductive. His nominee for the Fed, Kevin Warsh, is facing delays in his confirmation process because Senator Tom Tillis has stated he will not vote to advance the nomination until the Powell investigation concludes. This situation suggests Trump may be hindering his own objectives by pursuing personal grievances.

Looking Ahead

The subpoena issued to James Comey and the broader conspiracy theory driving the investigation will likely face intense scrutiny. Observers will be watching to see how Judge Cannon handles proceedings and whether the probe gains any traction beyond its current controversial standing. The resignations of federal prosecutors involved also signal potential further challenges and revelations regarding the investigation’s true nature and purpose.

Source: 'Nothing legitimate here': Attorney criticizes Comey subpoena in conspiracy probe (YouTube)