Heritage Foundation Plan Aims to Control Women, Expert Warns
The Heritage Foundation's new agenda aims to incentivize childbirth and traditional marriage through tax laws, but critics like Kathy Spiller of the Feminist Majority warn it's a plan for authoritarian control over women. Spiller emphasizes the need for the Equal Rights Amendment to protect against such legislative overreach and highlights the ongoing resistance from women's rights advocates.
Heritage Foundation Unveils Sweeping Agenda to Reshape Women’s Lives
A new, comprehensive plan released by the Heritage Foundation, detailed in a 922-page document, outlines a strategy to fundamentally alter the lives of women in America, with the stated goal of incentivizing childbirth and traditional family structures. However, critics, including Kathy Spillar, Executive Director of the Feminist Majority and Executive Editor of Ms. Magazine, argue that the agenda is far more insidious, aiming to exert authoritarian control over women by limiting their autonomy and financial independence.
‘Authoritarian Regime’ Tactics
Spiller, speaking on a recent broadcast, expressed grave concern over the overt nature of the Heritage Foundation’s proposals, stating, “They’re not even hiding, there’s no fig leaf here.” While the document suggests a focus on encouraging more children, Spiller asserts that the true objective is to “change tax laws, to provide incentives for women to have more children to get married younger, to stay married even in bad relationships.” She characterized this strategy as “the game plan of an authoritarian regime,” designed to foster dependency and limit women’s choices.
“You have got to have tax incentives and restrictions that cause women to have larger families, stay married and financially dependent on men. It’s the only way they can control the larger population as well.”
Kathy Spiller
The plan, which Spiller noted is not a fringe ideology but rather from individuals “very proximate to power right now,” specifically targets heterosexual, upper- and middle-income couples for tax benefits. This selective approach, Spiller contends, is part of a broader effort to consolidate power and influence societal norms through economic coercion.
Feminist Movement as a Counterforce
Spiller highlighted the historical resilience of the feminist movement in the face of significant opposition. Drawing parallels to the suffrage movement, where women faced arrest, violence, and even death, she emphasized that progress for women has always been a hard-fought battle.
“I can tell you the more people find out about this, especially women. They are rejecting it,” Spiller stated, expressing optimism that widespread awareness will galvanize resistance. She pointed to the feminist movement’s role in reflecting and enabling women’s gains in education, employment, and personal freedom.
Despite efforts to roll back progress, such as restricting abortion access in many states, Spiller noted the innovative responses from the feminist movement, including the accessibility of abortion pills via mail and telemedicine. “At every step that they try and push us back, there is a tremendous effort on the part of women,” she observed.
Broader Implications and Future Fights
The Heritage Foundation’s agenda, according to Spiller, extends beyond reproductive rights and marriage incentives. It encompasses a wide range of policies designed to diminish women’s power and autonomy. This includes efforts to restrict voting access, particularly for women who change their names upon marriage, as seen in the proposed “Save America Act.” Furthermore, the plan aims to limit access to contraception, impede workplace equality, and potentially restrict educational opportunities.
Spiller stressed the interconnectedness of rights, arguing that the gains made by the feminist movement have benefited society as a whole, including men, by fostering financial independence and broader freedoms. “Men are better off today because of the feminist movement and because women do have financial independence,” she asserted.
A key focus for the future, Spiller emphasized, is the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). “We don’t have constitutional equality for women. We don’t have a ban on sex discrimination in the United States Constitution,” she explained, adding that without the ERA, women remain vulnerable to “fits and starts by authoritarians in passing these laws.” The push for the ERA is seen as a crucial bulwark against such legislative overreach.
Women’s Impact and Ongoing Resistance
Spiller concluded by underscoring the significant impact women have had and continue to have on the political landscape, particularly in recognizing and resisting authoritarian tendencies. “So you can see that women are having an impact because they understand the threat is very real,” she stated, encouraging continued vigilance and activism.
The ongoing resistance to policies that undermine women’s rights is framed not just as a fight for women, but as a defense of democratic principles and societal progress. The strategies outlined by the Heritage Foundation, while ambitious, face a determined and organized opposition rooted in decades of feminist activism and a growing awareness of the stakes involved.
Source: Kathy Spillar: The Heritage Foundation wants to ‘use every lever of power’ against women (YouTube)





