Trump’s ‘War’ Sparks Oil Crisis, MAGA Base Divided

Escalating attacks in the Persian Gulf have crippled oil markets, leading to a significant spike in gas prices and disrupting global supply chains. Experts criticize President Trump's strategy as lacking clear objectives and a defined endgame, warning of foreseeable economic and geopolitical instability.

2 weeks ago
5 min read

Oil Markets Reel as Trump’s Iran Strategy Unravels

The escalating conflict in the Persian Gulf has triggered a severe disruption in global oil markets, with widespread attacks on tankers and shipping near the Strait of Hormuz. These strikes, which have seen 19 tankers and cargo ships targeted, have halted vessels from reaching the crucial waterway, through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply transits. The International Energy Agency has declared the ongoing situation as the biggest oil market disruption in a decade, a reality starkly at odds with President Donald Trump’s attempts to downplay the severity of the crisis.

Foreseeable Chaos: Expert Warns of Strategic Missteps

Brian Katulus, a former National Security Council, State Department, and Pentagon official now with the Middle East Institute, described the situation as “entirely foreseeable.” He stated, “Iran has signaled for decades that it would actually take the measures that it is currently taking. And we don’t seem to have a contingency plan to deal with what has been effectively the shutdown of this crucial waterway.” Katulus expressed bafflement that, despite the United States’ significant military power, there appears to be a lack of a clear contingency plan. He attributed this to President Trump’s “not actually having a clarity of objective about what he’s trying to do with the use of military force in Iran right now.”

“It was entirely foreseeable. Iran has signaled for decades that it would actually take the measures that it is currently taking. And we don’t seem to have a contingency plan to deal with what has been effectively the shutdown of this crucial waterway.” – Brian Katulus

Economic Fallout: Rising Gas Prices and Mounting Costs

The immediate consequence for Americans has been a significant surge in fuel prices. Oil prices are hovering around $100 per barrel, and gasoline prices have climbed by approximately 60 cents per gallon since the beginning of the recent military actions. Beyond the pump, the financial burden of the conflict is substantial. Katulus estimated the cost of the war in its initial 12-plus days at $11 billion, a figure that does not include the expenses related to building up hardware and personnel. “So this ticket price is going to go up,” he warned.

Trump’s Conflicting Messages and MAGA Base Concerns

President Trump’s public statements have been characterized by a disconnect from the market realities and the views of his own administration’s defense officials. While Trump has claimed the situation in the Strait of Hormuz is under control, with videos showing “very dangerous fires burning,” he asserted, “The straits are in great shape. We have knocked out all of their boats… I think we are in very good shape.” This contradicts the visible evidence and the rising market prices. The transcript highlights the confusion sown by Trump’s rhetoric, with Katulus comparing his communication style to a “three-card Monty” game, designed to mislead. Concerns are also surfacing within the MAGA base, as the economic pain at home intensifies, leading to speculation that Trump might seek distractions, such as releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Strategic Ambiguity: Strikes Without a Clear Endgame

A critical concern raised by experts is the apparent lack of a coherent strategy guiding the military actions against Iran. “What we have is strikes without strategy, a strategy to actually make our partners safe, make our troops safe and make even Israel safe,” Katulus observed. He emphasized the need for a “bigger long-term end goal, which we don’t have.” While the strikes aim to incapacitate Iran’s ability to launch attacks, the broader plan remains unclear. Even with the U.S. military’s capabilities, the long-term effectiveness is questioned. General Cain’s objective to eliminate Iran’s capacity to threaten its neighbors is described as a “tall order,” given Iran’s arsenal of drones and ballistic missiles, which have been used extensively against Gulf states.

The Nuclear Question and Diplomatic Pathways

The transcript also touches upon the potential need to secure any remaining nuclear material, a stated rationale for the conflict. However, it’s noted that aerial and naval assets cannot obliterate such material, necessitating a ground presence or a diplomatic solution. Katulus suggests that regional partners, including Arab countries, are actively seeking diplomatic off-ramps. They are reportedly engaging in back-channel communications with elements within the Iranian regime to de-escalate hostilities. The success of Trump’s previous efforts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza is cited as an example of what can be achieved with a clearly articulated end state and engagement with partners like Oman, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia.

Regional Dynamics: Living in the Same Neighborhood

The perspective from regional countries is crucial. While these nations do not align with the Iranian regime, they recognize the necessity of coexisting in the same neighborhood. Their preference is for a “sustainable result” rather than a strategy of “strikes without strategy.” The current approach, characterized by hitting targets without a clearly defined vision for the future of Iran or the region, is seen as insufficient. The lack of a clear political end state for the U.S. military engagement is a significant point of concern for international stability.

Looking Ahead: The Search for a Sustainable Resolution

As the situation continues to develop, the focus remains on whether a clear strategy and a diplomatic pathway can be established to de-escalate tensions and stabilize the oil markets. The economic repercussions are already being felt by consumers, and the long-term geopolitical implications of a conflict without a defined endgame are significant. The coming days will be critical in determining whether a sustainable resolution can be found that addresses both regional security concerns and the global demand for energy.


Source: ‘Warmonger’ Trump rocked by MAGA revolt & spiking gas prices as false claims about endgame unravel (YouTube)

Written by

Joshua D. Ovidiu

I enjoy writing.

11,003 articles published
Leave a Comment