Larry Elder Slams Iran as ‘Sick,’ Demands Regime ‘Defeat’

Larry Elder Calls Iran a ‘Sick’ Regime, Advocates for its ‘Defeat’ Amidst Global Tensions

Conservative radio host Larry Elder has issued a stark condemnation of the Iranian regime, labeling it a “sick” entity that must be “defeated.” Speaking on a recent broadcast, Elder argued that confronting Iran’s leadership is a moral imperative that outweighs short-term economic concerns, such as potential increases in gas prices. His remarks come at a time of heightened global scrutiny of Iran’s activities, including its nuclear program and alleged support for regional instability.

The Moral Argument: Fighting Evil Over Fuel Prices

Elder directly challenged the Biden administration’s approach, suggesting that prioritizing economic comfort over confronting a hostile regime is misguided. “Is a fight against evil more important than short-term bombing gas prices? Because that’s the argument that the President and the administration are making,” Elder questioned. He asserted that the Iranian regime, which he described as “wildly empowered” and “murderous,” should have been confronted much earlier in its history. “We should’ve taken out the ruler of Iran years ago,” he stated, implying a long-standing failure by successive U.S. administrations to decisively address the threat posed by Tehran.

Historical Atrocities and the Nature of the Iranian Regime

To underscore his point about the brutality of the Iranian leadership, Elder recalled historical tactics employed during the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988). He described how the regime allegedly sent child soldiers, some as young as nine years old, to their deaths by having them walk across minefields. “Tens of thousands of kids were murdered because of this,” Elder recounted, highlighting what he sees as the regime’s utter disregard for human life. “What civilized country does that?” he asked, rhetorically questioning the moral standing of such a government. He concluded this point by stating, “These are the people that we are fighting, and they are sick to be defeated.”

Critique of Media and Political Discourse

The conversation also touched upon broader media and political commentary, with Elder addressing remarks made by Whoopi Goldberg. Goldberg had suggested that discussions about former President Trump’s actions regarding Iran might be a distraction from other issues like the Epstein files or the Savannah Guthrie controversy. Elder dismissed this, arguing that individuals like Goldberg are not prevented from discussing these topics. “Nobody’s putting a gun to Whoopi Goldberg’s head and telling her not to talk about Epstein or not to talk about Nancy Guthrie, if she wants to,” he said. Elder suggested that such commentary stems from a fundamental opposition to Trump, regardless of his actions. “She despises President Trump. It does not matter what he does. If he walked on water, she was a he can’t swim,” Elder stated, implying that political bias often overshadows substantive policy discussions.

Focus on Iranian Oppression and Human Rights

Elder pivoted back to the core issue of Iran, questioning why the focus is not more squarely on the internal oppression within the country. He specifically raised the plight of Iranian women, suggesting they would achieve freedom if the current regime were to fall. “Why are they talking about the oppression of Iranian women who would be free if this regime goes away?” he asked. Elder implied that a greater international focus on the human rights abuses perpetrated by the Iranian government against its own citizens, including women, should be a central part of the discourse. He lamented the lack of attention given to the “20 or 30,000 Iranian civilians that were murdered by the thugs the government in power.”

Broader Implications and Future Outlook

Elder’s strong stance reflects a hawkish perspective on foreign policy, particularly concerning nations perceived as threats to international stability and democratic values. His remarks highlight a deep-seated concern about the nature of the Iranian regime and its impact on both regional geopolitics and its own population. The debate over how to engage with Iran—whether through economic pressure, diplomatic channels, or direct confrontation—remains a critical foreign policy challenge. As global energy markets react to geopolitical shifts, the long-term strategy for addressing Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its role in the Middle East will continue to be a subject of intense debate and scrutiny.

Source: Iran is ‘SICK’ and must be ‘DEFEATED’: Larry Elder (YouTube)